Case Law (SC) -- SLP dismissed against Gujarat High Court decision that the amount paid by the petitioner as pre-deposit in compliance of section 107 (6) (b) of the CGST Act utilizing the amount of Electronic Credit Ledger is valid. Therefore, the appeal filed by the petitioner is required to be heard on merits by considering the payment of pre-deposit by the petitioner from Electronic Credit Ledger as a sufficient compliance of the provisions of section 107 (6) (b) of the CGST Act.

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. v. YASHO INDUSTRIES LIMITED [SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No(s). 17547/2025] dated 19.05.2025

"We find that the impugned order passed by the High Court in R/SCA No. 10504/2023 would not call for any interference. Hence, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed."

YASHO INDUSTRIES LIMITED VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. [R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10504 of 2023][2022:GUJHC:56517]

"6. Considering the facts of the present case, the amount paid by the petitioner as pre-deposit in compliance of section 107 (6) (b) of the CGST Act utilizing the amount of Electronic Credit Ledger is required to be considered valid and impugned letter dated 25.04.2023 issued by the respondent No. 2 directing the petitioner to pay pre-deposit amount through Electronic Cash Ledger is therefore, hereby quashed and set aside. Therefore, the appeal filed by the petitioner is required to be heard on merits by considering the payment of pre-deposit by the petitioner from Electronic Credit Ledger as a sufficient compliance of the provisions of section 107 (6) (b) of the CGST Act. The petition is accordingly disposed of."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Case law (SC) -- SLP dismissed against order of High Court where notice u/s 148 was quashed stating that notice u/s 148 must comply with the Faceless Scheme regardless of the Assessee being a NRI/Indian Citizen.

Case law (SC) - Once the Resolution Plan is approved by the NCLT, All the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government, if not a part of the Resolution Plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings could be continued in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the adjudicating authority grants its approval under Section 31 of the IB Code.

Case Law (SC) - Where an assessee is entitled to deduction u/s 80HHC as well as 80IA, the deductions have to be computed separately, but the total deduction shall be restricted to gross total income computed under section 80IA.