Posts

Showing posts from August, 2023

Rule 3(1) of IT Rules regarding determination of perquisite for accommodation is changed and relief granted to employee.

  “2.       Where the accommodation is provided by any other employer and— (a) where the accommodation is owned by the employer, or (i) 10% of salary in cities having population exceeding 40 lakhs as per 2011 census; (ii) 7.5% of salary in cities having population exceeding 15 lakhs but not exceeding 40 lakhs as per 2011 census; (iii) 5% of salary in other areas, in respect of the period during which the said accommodation was occupied by the employee during the previous year as reduced by the rent, if any, actually paid by the employee. (b) where the accommodation is taken on lease or rent by the employer. Actual amount of lease rental paid or payable by the employer or 10% of salary, whichever is lower, as reduced by the rent, if any, actually paid by the employee.” Notification No. 65/2023 dated 18.08.2023      

Rule 26 of IT Rules substituted -- Rate of exchange for the purpose of TDS on income payable in foreign currency is as shall be the telegraphic transfer buying rate of such currency as on the date on which the tax is required to be deducted at source.

Rule 26 -- For the purpose of deduction of tax at source on any income payable in foreign currency, the rate of exchange for the calculation of the value in rupees of such income payable––  (i) to an assessee outside India;  (ii) to a Unit located in an International Financial Services Centre;  (iii) by a Unit located in an International Financial Services Centre to an assessee in India,  shall be the telegraphic transfer buying rate of such currency as on the date on which the tax is required to be deducted at source under the provisions of Chapter XVIIB by the person responsible for paying such income. Notification No. 64/2023 dated 17.08.2023

Case Law (SC) -- Interest income earned on fixed deposits made in the banks by the Clubs has to be treated like any other income from other sources within the meaning of Section 2(24) of Income Tax Act and such income would also not be covered under the principle of mutuality.

  Question of Law --   Whether the deposit of surplus funds by the appellant Clubs by way of bank deposits in various banks is liable to be taxed in the hands of the Clubs or, whether, the principle of mutuality would apply and the interest earned from the deposits would not be subject to tax under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Triple test of Principle of Mutuality "31. While considering the triple test for applying the principle of mutuality, we find that in the case of Bangalore Club, the aforesaid triple test was applied. It was reiterated that the principle of mutuality envisages: (i) Complete identity between the contributors and participators; (ii) Action of the participators and contributors must be in furtherance of the mandate of the associations or the Clubs. The mandate of the Club is a question of fact which has to be determined from the Memorandum or Articles of Associations, Rules of Membership, Rules of the Organisation, etc., which must be ...

CBDT issued circular providing guidelines regarding taxability of amount received on maturity from life insurance policies which are not exempt u/s 10(10D) of the Act. CBDT also notified Rule 11UACA for computation of income chargeable to tax under clause (xiii) of sub-section (2) of section 56 in respect of receipt from such taxable life insurance policies.

“The Finance Act, 2023 (Finance Act), inter-alia,- l. amended clause (10D) of section 10 of the Act by substituting the existing sixth proviso with the new sixth, seventh and eighth provisos to, inter-alia, provide that: (i)              with effect from assessment year 2024-25, the sum received under a life insurance policy, other than a unit linked insurance policy, issued on or after the 151 day of April, 2023, shall not be exempt under the said clause if the amount of premium payable for any of the previous years during the term of such policy exceeds Rs 5,00,000 [sixth proviso]; (ii)             if premium is payable for more than one life insurance policy, other than a unit linked insurance policy, issued on or after 01.04.2023, the exemption under the said clause shall be available only with respect to such policies where the aggregate premium does not exceed R...

CBDT notified extention of Safe Harbour Rule (Rule 10TD of Income Tax Rules) for Assessment Year 2023-24.

 "G.S.R. 595(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 read with sub-section (2) of section 92CB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:___  1. Short title and commencement. - (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (Fifteenth Amendment) Rules, 2023.            (2) They shall deemed to have come into force from the 1st day of April 2023.  2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in rule 10TD, in sub-rule (3B), for the words and figures “assessment years 2020- 21, 2021-22 and 2022-23”, the words and figures “assessment years 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23 and 2023-24” shall be substituted.  [Notification No. 58/2023/ F. No. 370142/26/2023-TPL]  SOURABH JAIN, Under Secy.  Explanatory Memorandum: This amendment is effective from 1st day of April, 2023 and applies to assessment year 2023-24 relevant t...

Case Law (SC) -- If in any statutory rule or statutory notification two expressions are used - one in general words and the other in special terms - under the rules of interpretation, it has to be understood that the special terms were not meant to be included in the general expression; alternatively, it can be said that where a statute contains both a general provision as well as a specific provision, the latter must prevail.

 "Trite to say, the Legislature may not have intended two entries for the selfsame commodity, one under the exempted category and the other under the taxable entry. Therefore, maize starch has to be either covered by Taxation Entry No.61 or Exemption Entry No.8. For the purpose of ascertaining which of the two is the applicable entry, we need not labour much having regard to the language in which the two entries are expressed. Taxation Entry No.61 provides a more specific description and maize starch undoubtedly being a ‘kind of starch’ would, therefore, be comprehended in it. This is more so because what is covered by Exemption Entry No.8 is maize, which is a product of millet. The position would have been otherwise if Exemption Entry No.8 or any other entry in Schedule III carried the description of product of maize instead of ‘product of millet’.  24. Law is well settled that if in any statutory rule or statutory notification two expressions are used - one in general words ...