Case Law (SC) -- The levy of the surcharge under proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act is is now not res integra in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Vatika Township Private Limited 2015 (1) SCC 1

"While passing the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has relied upon earlier decision of this Court in the case of Suresh N. Gupta (supra). However, the said decision has been specifically overruled by this Court in the case of Vatika Township Private Limited (supra)

9.2 In view of the above, the question of law with respect to levy of the surcharge under proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax   is   held   in favour   of   the   assessee   and   against   the revenue. It is observed and held that in the present case the assessee is not liable to pay the surcharge under proviso to Section   113   of   the   Income   Tax   Act.   To   that   extent   the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court and the assessment order qua the surcharge under proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act deserves to be quashed and set aside."

K.L. Swamy v. CIT , CA No. 3704/2012 dated 13.01.2023

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Case law (SC) -- SLP dismissed against order of High Court where notice u/s 148 was quashed stating that notice u/s 148 must comply with the Faceless Scheme regardless of the Assessee being a NRI/Indian Citizen.

Case law (SC) - Once the Resolution Plan is approved by the NCLT, All the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government, if not a part of the Resolution Plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings could be continued in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the adjudicating authority grants its approval under Section 31 of the IB Code.

Case Law (SC) - Where an assessee is entitled to deduction u/s 80HHC as well as 80IA, the deductions have to be computed separately, but the total deduction shall be restricted to gross total income computed under section 80IA.